Frame Shape

Criminal Appeals

Frame Shape

David Zarmi has both prosecuted and defended on appeal a wide range of criminal offenses. Drawing on years of experience, Zarmi Law stands ready to represent you on any criminal appeal whether it be blue or white collar.

  • Assault and battery
  • Criminal threats
  • Drug trafficking
  • Internet fraud
  • Mortgage fraud
  • DUI
  • Financial crimes
  • Conspiracy
  • Healthcare fraud
  • Murder
  • Perjury
  • Possession of contraband
  • Money laundering
  • Mail fraud
  • RICO
  • Property crimes
  • Sexual crimes
  • Computer crimes
  • Wire fraud
  • Tax evasion

Zarmi understands the stakes are the highest when it comes to being accused of a crime. Having the experience at the Department of Justice of advocating the district attorney’s position through prosecution in the California and federal courts for over eight years has really helped Zarmi understand the inner workings of the criminal court system.

Often times people think of crime as isolated to the criminal justice system, however having experience in working on high profile cases, including those accused in the #Metoo movement, Zarmi intimately understands that there is often a civil consequence for the criminal allegations. Once a verdict is reached it’s important to retain counsel like Zarmi who can draw on years of experience, craft creative arguments, and push the law to address all consequences, including restitution.

“From working at both the Department of Justice and the Court of Appeal, Zarmi knows all too well how appeals lose simply because briefs submitted attempt to relitigate facts, which ensures their certain demise.”

Having first argued on his own granted petition for review in the California Supreme Court at the young age of 29, he learned early on what it means to not give up and successfully see a case through to the end and has been lead attorney in several Supreme Court cases since.

The advantage of retaining a Certified Appellate Specialist who has won over 300 appellate and collateral review matters is all in the results. Zarmi has the ability to adopt whatever position he has in front of him, solely focusing on the law applied, and employing his strong research and writing skills to create out of the box arguments that win.

THE CRIMINAL APPEAL PROCESS EXPLAINED
THE CRIMINAL APPEAL PROCESS EXPLAINED
Initiating the Appeal:

The appeal process begins with the Notice of Appeal, a document that signifies your intent to challenge a decision. This must be filed within a specific timeframe, usually triggered by sentencing.

Compilation of Trial Records:

Once the Notice of Appeal is lodged, the court clerks and reporters prepare a formal record of all evidence and testimonies from the trial. These materials are scrutinized to assess if the original trial was conducted properly and if the rulings were legally valid.

Submission of Briefs:

In this phase, we present a structured argument explaining errors in the decisions of the trial court and/or jury. This typically includes a critique of the lower court’s decision, identification of any errors, and the legal basis for your appeal. The Attorney General in state cases and the United States Attorney in federal court will draft a response and we will file a reply brief addressing each of their counterarguments.

Reply Brief:

In an appeal, the onus of proof lies with the defendant. However, you and your lawyer get another chance to counter the prosecutor’s response. While new evidence cannot be introduced, you can highlight inaccuracies in the defense of the lower court’s decision.

Oral Arguments & Request for Rehearing:

Appeals may also involve Oral arguments that underscore the facts of the case, elucidate the importance of the issues, and provide clarity if questions arise. If the appellate court’s decision is unfavorable, a Request for Rehearing can be filed.

Request for Review:

If the Court of Appeals makes a decision, you can still appeal to the respective Supreme Courts. A Petition for Review or Certiorari is the first step in this process.

high profile represntative criminal cases
high profile represntative criminal cases
  • Created precedent for bringing malicious prosecution cases against the federal government removing the discretionary function shield from law enforcement when they are alleged to have "fabricated evidence, tampered with witnesses, lied under oath, or otherwise knowingly offered false testimony to induce criminal charges against the plaintiff."

  • Supreme Court determination of the definition of metal knuckles and the application of the statute to possession of a metal pipe;

  • Supreme Court determination of the application of the burglary statute to second floor balconies;

  • Supreme Court determination as to whether reseating a juror who was improperly stricken requires explicit waiver by defendant;

  • Supreme Court determination as to whether two prior strike convictions resulting from the same act could act as first and second strikes in a Three Strikes case;

  • Capital case with more than eight separate issues including lying-in-wait special circumstance for “luring” the victim to the defendant’s home;

  • Appeal involving conviction of Temple City mayor for accepting bribery and related crimes;

  • Writ involving conviction of television contestant for rape identified by victim after watching television show Blind Date

Judicial Experience at the Court of Appeal
Zarmi’s cases have resulted in over 25 published opinions.During his time at the Court of Appeal, he helped the justices decide numerous criminal matters and drafted over 20 final criminal opinions, including:
  • People v. Castillo (Oct. 12, 2016) 2016 Cal.App.Unpub. LEXIS 7354
  • People v. Jones (Aug. 12, 2016) 2016 Cal.App.Unpub. LEXIS 5913
  • People v. Washington (Aug. 5, 2016) 2016 Cal.App.Unpub. LEXIS 5783
  • People v. Martin (June 12, 2017) 2017 WL 2533661
  • People v. Villegasruiz (June 7, 2017) 2017 WL 2463402
  • People v. Stanford (May 3, 2017) 2017 WL 1684346
  • People v. Carrillo (Apr. 20, 2017) 2017 WL 1406827
  • In re S.B. (Jan. 20, 2017) 2017 Cal.App.Unpub. LEXIS 377
  • People v. Rivera (Nov. 30, 2016) 2016 Cal.App.Unpub. LEXIS 8654
  • People v. Jimenez (Sep. 7, 2016) 2016 Cal.App.Unpub. LEXIS 6594
  • People v. Brixey (Aug. 11, 2016) 2016 Cal.App.Unpub. LEXIS 5873
  • People v. Arvizu (June 17, 2016) 2016 Cal.App.Unpub. LEXIS 4471
Centuries of Adjudicating and Writing Law
Having written opinions for the Chief Justice of the Court of Appeal, drafted decisions of Los Angeles County Superior Court judges, and served as a judge pro tem himself, David Zarmi's legal acumen comes from the context of a robust lineage of legal experts and advisors. His ancestry dates back to 1040 and the following is a partial list of ancestors that led the way in explaining and codifying Talmudic law.
  • R' Moshe Yechiel Halevi Epstein "Aish Das" - Great Grandather (1892-1971) Av Beis Din Ozarow-Chentshin
  • R' Meir Horowitz "Imrei Noam of Dzikiv" - 4th Great Grandfather (1819-1877) Av Beis Din Dzikiv
  • R' Reuven Halevi Horowitz-Rychter - 4th Great Grandfather (1754-1828) Av Beis Din Zarnoweic
  • R' Yechezkel Yehoshua Feivel Teomim - 6th Great Grandfather (1735-1771) Av Beis Din Przemysl
  • R' Yehoshua Halevi Horowitz - 6th Great Grandfather (1675-1795) Av Beis Din Bisk
  • R' Meir Halevi Horowitz "Mahram of Tiktin" "Beis Yaakov" "Gaon Tzvi" - 7th Great Grandfather (1656-1746) Av Beis Din Oneilev, Tyrocin, and Zloczew
  • Rav Yosef Chaim Teomim - 7th Great Grandfather (1714-1782) Av Beis Din Lublin
  • R' Yissachar Ber Halevi - 7th Great Grandfather (1667-1767) Av Beis Din Chernovtsy
  • R' Yehoshua Halevi Segal - 8th Great Grandfather (1655-1701) Av Beis Din Dobromyl
  • R' Nassan Nata Shapiro - 8th Great Grandfather (1650-1728) Av Beis din Turobin
  • Rav Shmuel Schmelke Halevi Horowitz - 8th Great Grandfather (1615-1696) Av Beis Din Tarn
  • R' Meir Getz - 8th Great Grandfather (1686-1738) Av Beis Din Lask
  • R' Aryeh leib Teomim - 8th Great Grandfather (1687-1740) Av Beis Din Kreshinov
  • R' Yitzchak Landau - 8th Great Grandfather (1688-1767) Av Beis Din Cracow and Lvov
  • R' Yechezkal Feivel Teomim - 9th Great Grandfather (1654-1733) Av Beis Din Przemys
  • R' Yonah Teomim "Kikayon D'Yonah" - 10th Great Grandfather (1596-1669) Av Beis Din Nikolsburg
  • R' Shmuel Halevi Eidels "Maharsha" - 12th Great Grandfather (1555-1631) Famous Author Codifying Jewish Law
  • R' Yoel Ben Shmuel Sirkis "Bach" - 12th Great Grandfather (1561-1640) Famous Author Codifying Jewish Law
  • R' Meir Ben Gedalia "Maharam of Lublin" - 13th Great Grandfather (1558-1616) Famous Author Codifying Jewish Law
  • R' Shlomo Luria "Maharshal" - 14th Great Grandfather (1510-1573) Famous Author Codifying Jewish Law
  • R' Meir Katzenellenbogen "Maharam of Padua" - 14th Great Grandfather (1482-1564) Famous Author Codifying Jewish Law
  • R' Moshe Ben Israel Isserles "Rema" - 14th Great Grandfather (1530-1572) Famous Author Codifying Jewish Law
  • R' Yehuda Loew "Maharal" - 15th Great Grandfather (1525-1609) Famous Author Codifying Jewish Law
  • R' Meir Ben Baruch "Maharam of Rothenburg" - 22nd Great Grandfather (1215-1293) Tosafist and Commentator on Jewish Law
  • R' Yaakov Ben Meir Klonymus "Rabeinu Tam" - 24th Great Grandfather (1100-1171) Tosafist and Commentator on Jewish Law
  • R' Shlomo Yitzchaki "Rashi" - 25th Great Grandfather (1040-1105) Commentator on Jewish Law